FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS OF MULTI-BUSINESS FORESTRY IN SOCIAL FORESTRY IN FOREST AREAS WITH SPECIAL MANAGEMENT (KHDPK)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59465/ijfr.2026.13.1.123-137

Keywords:

Multi-business forestry, social forestry, social acceptance, financial feasibility, ecological suitability

Abstract

The concept of multi-business forestry (Mb-F) aims to increase the economic benefits of forests, which have thus far made little contribution, without ignoring their ecological functions. The opportunity to develop multi-business forestry in social forestry (SF) activities within the Forest Area with Special Management (Kawasan Hutan Dengan Pengelolaan Khusus/KHDPK) is huge. With one area management permit, many business activities can be carried out. This study aims to determine the feasibility of multi-business forestry using screening method for social acceptance (community preference), financial feasibility (NPV, B/C Ratio, and IRR), and ecological suitability (soil type, rainfall, and location altitude). The results show that socially, the community accepts and has even implemented the concept of multi-business forestry through agroforestry. However, most permit holders consider it necessary to regulate the number of trees to optimize land use. Economically, all multi-business patterns implemented are feasible, with the presence of aren (Arenga pinnata) and sheep being important keys to the sustainability of SF. Ecologically, some NTFPs species cultivated by the community are less suited to local conditions, which can result in suboptimal production. The existence of investors or business entities is very important in the sustainability of forestry multi-businesses, which are mostly based on NTFPs and require high capital.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arage, A. (2021). Assessment of farmer’s perception and adoption of agroforestry practices: The case of Assosa District, Western Ethiopia. American Journal of Applied Scientific Research, 7(2), 15. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajasr.20210702.11

Astuti, E. W., Hidayat, A., & Nurrochmat, D. R. (2020). Community forest scheme: Measuring impact in livelihood case study Lombok Tengah Regency, West Nusa Tenggara Province. Jurnal Manajemen Hutan Tropika (Journal of Tropical Forest Management), 26(1), 52–58. https://doi.org/10.7226/jtfm.26.1.52

Balai Pemantapan Kawasan Hutan dan Tata Lingkungan (BPKHTL) Wilayah XI. (2024). Rencana Pengelolaan Kawasan Hutan Dengan Pengelolaan Khusus (KHDPK) Periode Tahun 2024-2033.

Central Statistics Agency. (2000). GDP by Sector. Jakarta: Central Statistics Agency.

Central Statistics Agency. (2003). GDP by Sector. Jakarta: Central Statistics Agency.

Central Statistics Agency of Ciamis Regency. (2023). Ciamis Regency in Figure. Ciamis: Central Statistics Agency of Ciamis Regency

Central Statistics Agency of Pangandaran Regency. (2023). Pangandaran Regency in Figure.

Chechina, M., & Hamann, A. (2015). Choosing species for reforestation in diverse forest communities: social preference versus ecological suitability. Ecosphere, 6(11), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1890/ES15-00131.1

Chuma, G. B., Cirezi, N. C., Mondo, J. M., Mugumaarhahama, Y., Ganza, D. M., Katcho, K., Mushagalusa, G. N., & Schmitz, S. (2021). Suitability for agroforestry implementation around Itombwe Natural Reserve (RNI), eastern DR Congo: Application of the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) approach in geographic information system tool. Trees, Forests and People, 6, 100125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2021.100125

Faadhilah, A. F., Karuniasa, M., & Tumuyu, S. S. (2023). Land suitability assessments for the palm plantation (Arenga pinnata L.) as non-timber forest product using geographic information system. Jurnal Teknik Pertanian Lampung (Journal of Agricultural Engineering), 12(4), 957. https://doi.org/10.23960/jtep-l.v12i4.957-967

Hernández-Zaragoza, P., Valdez-Lazalde, J. R., Aldrete, A., & Martínez-Trinidad, T. (2019). Multi-criteria and multi-objective evaluation to optimize the selection of areas to establish forest plantations. Madera y Bosques, 25(2). https://doi.org/10.21829/myb.2019.2521819

Kusumaningrum, D. A., Risyad, A., Siagian, J. A., Melinda, K., & Tisyadana, M. (2024). The potency of coffee plants in agroforestry system in Baringin Village, Agam Regency, West Sumatra to support social forestry program and its contribution to mitigate climate change. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1315(1), 012017. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1315/1/012017

Lillo, E. P., Malaki, A. B., Alcazar, S. M. T., Rosales, R., Redoblado, B. R., Diaz, J. L. B., Pantinople, E. M., & Buot, I. E. J. (2021). Inventory of native and mother trees in Key Biodiversity Areas of Cebu Island, Philippines for species selection in local reforestation programs. Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity, 22(11). https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d221105

Malahayati, M. (2018). The role of the forest-related sector to the Indonesian Economy: SAM Multiplier Analysis 1985-2008. Open Agriculture, 3(1), 171–179. https://doi.org/10.1515/opag-2018-0018

Mankhin, B., Khan, Md. A., Begum, Mst. E. A., & Hossain, M. I. (2023). Market attractiveness of pineapple and banana agroforestry systems of Madhupur Sal (Shorea robusta) forest: A sustainable way of generating income and conserving forests. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research, 11(100475), 1–8.

Ministry of Agriculture. (2013). Budidaya Tanaman Aren (Cultivation of Sugar Palm Plants).

Ministry of Agriculture. (2014). Minister of Agriculture Regulation No 128 of 2014: Pedoman Teknis Pembangunan Kebun Induk dan Kebun Entres Kopi Arabika dan Kopi Robusta.

Ministry of Agriculture. (2019). Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) Kapulaga (Amomum cardamomum). Directorate General of Horticulture, Ministry of Agriculture.

Ministry of Agriculture. (2021). Buku Lapang Budidaya Durian (Durian Cultivation Field Book). Director General of Horticulture, Ministry of Agriculture.

Ministry of Environment and Forestry. (2023). Minister of Environment and Forestry Regulation No. 4 of 2023: Social Forestry in Forest Areas with Special Management (KHDPK).

Mutaqin, F., Nurrochmat, D. R., & Supriyanto, B. (2023). Evaluating the sustainability of forest utilization in the protected areas of Mandalagiri Forest, West Java, Indonesia. Biodiversitas, 24(5), 2745–2755. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d240528

Novasari, D., Wulandari, C., Harianto, S. P., Gumay Febryano, I., Bakri, S., & Kaskoyo, H. (2023). Community preferences for agroforestry patterns in supporting future forestry development. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1133(1), 012066. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1133/1/012066

Nurrochmat, D. R., Hendroyono, B., & Suryanto. (2021). Multiusaha Kehutanan: Konsep dan Implementasi Bisnis Kehutanan Berkelanjutan. . IPB Press.

Oktoyoki, H., Windari, E. H., Pratama, B., & Ansiska, P. (2023). Post-permit social forestry: An analysis of the economic impact of the forestry revolving fund facility to the community of forest farmers. E3S Web of Conferences, 373, 05007. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202337305007

Pambudi, A. S. (2023). Capaian, tantangan implementasi, dan rekomendasi kebijakan perhutanan sosial Di Indonesia. Jurnal Kebijakan Pemerintahan, 74–94. https://doi.org/10.33701/jkp.v6i2.3551

Rachmawan, D., Seda, F., & Siburian, R. (2022). The social forestry in Forest Farmer Group Gunung Gajah Lestari, Pemalang, Indonesia: Encouragement hope beyond the limited choice. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Rural Socio-Economic Transformation: Agrarian, Ecology, Communication and Community Development Perspectives, RUSET 2021, 14-15 September 2021, Bogor, West Java, Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.14-9-2021.2317169

Ridho, A., Fathun, L. M., & Juned, M. (2019). Implementasi kerjasama Indonesia - Inggris dalam kerangka Multistakeholder Forestry Programme 3 (MFP 3) terhadap peningkatan produk kayu Indonesia. Jurnal Asia Pacific Studies, 3(1), 74. https://doi.org/10.33541/japs.v3i1.967

Rinaldi, R., Barlian, E., Syah, N., & Umar, I. (2024). The impact of social forestry on communities and forest areas Salimbutan Lubuk Alung. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(5), 2356–2362. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i5.7196

Rivera, S. B., Barrette, M., & Thiffault, N. (2016). Issues and perspectives on the use of exotic species in the sustainable management of Canadian forests. REFORESTA, 1, 261–280. https://doi.org/10.21750/REFOR.1.13.13

Sahara, S., Pratinda, W. N. A. S., & Djaenudin, D. (2022). The impacts of investment in the forestry sector on the Indonesian economy. Indonesian Journal of Forestry Research, 9(2), 251–263. https://doi.org/10.20886/ijfr.2022.9.2.251-263

Santiago, L. E., Forero-Montaña, J., Melendez-Ackerman, E. J., Gould, W. A., & Zimmerman, J. K. (2022). Social Acceptability of a sustainable forestry industry in Puerto Rico: Views of private, public, and non-profit sectors. Forests, 13(4), 576. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13040576

Soraya, E., Senawi, S., Wardhana, W., & Larasati, B. (2022). Spatial modeling of land suitability in agroforestry blocks of Gadjah Mada University’s Teaching Forest. Jurnal Ilmu Kehutanan, 16(2), 219–233. https://doi.org/10.22146/jik.v16i2.1820

Suryandari, E. Y., Djaenudin, D., & Alviya, I. (2017). Persepsi pelaku hutan rakyat dan industri kayu skala kecil-menengah terhadap kesiapan implementasi SVLK. Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan Kehutanan, 14(2), 149–164. https://doi.org/10.20886/jakk.2017.14.2.149-164

Suryanto, Nurrochmat, D., Tarigan, S., Siregar, I., Yassir, I., Tandio, T., & Abdulah, L. (2023). Defining the objectives and roles of Indonesian production forest governance through the multi-business forestry policy narrative. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1266(1), 012030. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1266/1/012030

Tolo, E. Y. S. (2014). Public participation in the implementation of forestry decentralization in Indonesia. Bisnis & Birokrasi Journal, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.20476/jbb.v20i2.3065

Widiyanto, A. (2024). Preferensi Petani Terhadap Jenis Tanaman Bawah Pada Sistem Agroforestri di Perhutanan Sosial. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Hasil Penelitian Agribisnis, 33–40.

Willmott, A., Willmott, M., Grass, I., Lusiana, B., & Cotter, M. (2023). Harnessing the socio-ecological benefits of agroforestry diversification in social forestry with functional and phylogenetic tools. Environmental Development, 47, 100881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2023.100881

Downloads

Published

27-04-2026

How to Cite

Widiyanto, A., Nurrochmat, D. R., Trison, S., & Subarudi. (2026). FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS OF MULTI-BUSINESS FORESTRY IN SOCIAL FORESTRY IN FOREST AREAS WITH SPECIAL MANAGEMENT (KHDPK). Indonesian Journal of Forestry Research, 13(1), 123–137. https://doi.org/10.59465/ijfr.2026.13.1.123-137

Similar Articles

<< < 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.